[Many Casual & Average players] quietly moved on without needing to do the "Look at me strut out the door in my drama queen dress" routine -Ungood
...make the favor, experience, and loot the same across the board, regardless of the difficulty ...Then, folks can set the difficulty to their enjoyment level -TerysDethswind
Certain classes can have familiars. Certain creatures can be familiars. And familiars aren't only cosmetic.
Certain classes can have companion creatures. Certain creatures can be companions. And companions aren't only cosmetic.
Certain classes can Summon Monsters. Certain creatures can be summoned. And summoned creatures aren't only cosmetic.
See the pattern?
Comparing the cosmetic pets to familiars, companions, and summoned creatures is missing the point by a wide margin.
I don't even have a problem with cosmetics. Introduce visible cloaks to the game, available only through cosmetics and I'll spend some money on it. Introduce mounts that can be used in some of the BIG zones (and make some zones where people would want them), and I'll buy them. Give casters a line of "Illusion Spells" where people can buy certain cosmetic Illusions, and I'll buy them. I could go on for pages of LORE compatible cosmetics that the game could be selling... but isn't. Instead we've got beanie babies.
No it does not. And I hope you're spending enough money to make up for all the money I (and others ) are no longer spending. I mean, what kind of crackpot am I that I should criticize a D&D game for not producing content that is consistent with the lore of the actual game? You guys need to get rid of players like me as quickly as possible.And just because they impact your enjoyment in a negative way (for some unfathomable reason), doesn't mean they can't have a positive impact on other players. Your personal preference does not trump that of everyone else.
Fluff sells. Fluff keeps us in the content we all want so much. Some buy the fluff to support the game, some buy tons of Otto Boxes.
Maybe we should start a campaign to stop making and selling the fluff til more bugs are fixed? No more new pets, no more Otto box sales, no more armor skin development.
All that is wrong with DDO, life, taxes, poltics, religion, music, fast food, education, the criminal justice system, the weather, society, the universe, and previously-discontinued-but-now-on-their-way-back snack cakes, is all the fault of Wizards of the Coast. I know this because Fred told me so, and Mind Flayers are smart.
Actually, I don't.FB needs to pick his 'fights' a little better when it comes to immersion in a MMO.
This is a legitimate, lore adverse, complaint. And it's a fabricated issue on their part. It's unnecessary. Fun, lore-consistent cosmetics and other utility could have been the alternative.
If the developers aren't told how much some of us dislike this, they aren't able to consider catering to our needs as well as yours. Last I checked, they want all of our money, not just the money of people who buy cutesy cosmetic pets.
Again, the consequence is simple: Beanie Babies Online is not the game some of us signed on for. And with every miniaturization of an iconic D&D creature that's bouncing around town and in dungeons doing goofy tricks, we go deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole.
When Rift came out several people I play with did their damndest to get me to abandon DDO to go play it. Same with Aion and LotR and Vanguard and Conan and The Secret World and SWG, and on and on. I've stuck with DDO, despite all its flaws, primarily, because I like the D&D *world* ("worlds" now) this game is based on. The mechanical translations (like the SP bar and melee combat) to an MMO are pretty good by MMO standards (been playing these things since UO and EQ.) But turning this joint into a petting zoo is a fundamental, and unnecessary, evolution of the look and feel of the game. It's a core change to the campaign setting. That some of you can't comprehend that isn't my problem. It's ultimately going to be Turbine's problem.
Because if I've resisted all those other games over the years but am having an ever increasingly more difficult time arguing against Elder Scrolls Online (and I've never even played any of the ES games) then maybe it's worth noting that people aren't just leaving the game because of bugs, p2w, and nerfs. The game purposefully failing to even look like the world it proposes to be might be *part* of the problem.
Last edited by Full_Bleed; 06-09-2013 at 11:08 PM.
Of course all pets must be from d&d world,thats the only rule. and they are
Last edited by Huldrekall; 06-10-2013 at 02:47 AM.
Turbine is not fabricating this issue, with respect, you are. With the numerous posts/threads about pets, even with the forums being a small part of the population, your anti-pet crusade is clearly in the minority. But keep your uphill battle going to remove things from all the players that want and enjoy them.
You see, for most of the DDO playerbase, these pets ARE lore consistent. Ignoring the huge lore breakers and immersion destroying things in DDO for this very small thing is disingenuous at best.
You don't like pets, thats fine and your personal choice. You have the option to run groups without any pets while in Quests and that does work, if you ask politely. But to want pets gone for everyone is pushing a personal hangup on everyone else, and we all know that does not work and will not work not when money is involved.
Even the poll to have the option to visually disable pets has fallen flat.
Turbine does not have any problem with selling pets as they are making them plenty of money to support further content design and pet design. Only the players that want them taken away from all others are having a problem doing it.
I would rather they dedicate any and all resources to things that actually make the game better. But if they insist on adding useless pets I would at least appreciate if they gave us a "/showpets off" command so we don't have to see other people's pets if we don't want to. They can be irritating visual noise, especially when you get multiple pets in a group. I have no problem with other people having/wanting pets, despite their fully useless nature, so long as it doesn't impact MY experience.
This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.Reload