Sarkiki - Orexis - Pallikaria - Epithymia - Musouka - Empnefsi | Cannith Server
I'd prefer a non-turbine point use of the stone of change to un-bind items myself AND with ingredients NOT found from raids. They do not deserve preferential treatment.
Q: Why can't I just have what I want? I'm even prepared to pay for it!
A: Because there may be bad consequences for other people and the game itself.
OP, your request may seem innocuous to you, but it could ultimately affect often raids are run and how loot is shared in them.
I am very glad that we aren't yet at the point where someone with money demands something on the forums and Turbine employees rush to accommodate their every wish. Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full sir!
Why would anyone ever put a good item of raid loot up for roll or pass it to someone they didn't like when there is a mechanism for unbinding it so another one of your characters can use it? Hey, my fighter can't use this torc, but I might make a favoured soul who can. Yoink!
Sure, it won't mean that everyone on every server will become completely self centred all at once, but there will be an effect on the average PUG raid.
And it really doesn't matter what mechanism is invented to change BTC to BTA items, if a process is available, it will work to support that kind of selfishness rather than sharing.
It would also work to the considerable disadvantage of new players, who don't have guild mates or friends in every raid looking out for them.
As for your icy bursted falchion and your two low level cloaks of night, if you don't want to TR your character, just replace them. They are very replaceable, with a bare minimum of work.
I would have a little more sympathy if we were talking about a character laden with epic items that took years of work to acquire, but my answer would still be: not signed.
Astrican on Khyber
Not too long ago, if we wanted to save an item from permanent damage or destruction, our only option was to bind it to character via the stone of change.
Now that there are other options to deal with item damage, there absolutely should be a way to reverse that particular binding.
Bust sorry. any item that was crafted or looted as a binding item should remain bound.
There is no mechanism in the game that supports sharing at all. It is up to the players to be willing to do that.
Going through several TRs you are likely to cross the same classes on several. Now you could not worry about gearing the classes you are just passing through and pass the loot on and be kind and generous, you could inherit that gear from one of your trs and probably pass on it because you really don't need it, or you could end up taking and keeping the same piece of gear many times.
I don't quite agree with you here. The mechanisms that support sharing are:
1. The ability to pass other players BTC loot in chests
2. The property of raid loot that means it binds to character rather than account when removed from a chest.
3. Limited inventory and bank space
So at the moment, no. 2 doesn't reward you for taking items for which you have no immediate use. For some people that can make the difference between passing rather than looting.
If the binding were changed to BTA, there is also considerably less incentive to share with people who aren't already friends or guild mates.
There's also the issue of limited storage space. Having too much raid loot is not a problem when you can shift it to a mule. I've deleted raid loot because I've been short of space on my main, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. It also makes me careful about what I pick up.
Astrican on Khyber
However could I use the example of how many bta items I have passed in a chest because I already had enough that I can switch them from character at need as a reason that you're wrong to think items will no longer be passed?
What I've said about mechanisms existing to promote sharing is true now, not in some hypothetical situation where BTC no longer exists.
I've passed many BTA items myself and also had items passed to me. I'll continue to do so because I mainly play one toon and he has almost everything he wants. I also like to see people get items which are more useful for them than they are for me, which is why my ranger has passed several torcs to casters who I thought would better use them.
I don't think sharing will stop completely. Some people are too nice not to share. Others don't mind sharing because they already have what they want and they don't like to let good loot rot in chests or in their own banks.
What I said in my first post was that I thought sharing would decrease in PUG raids. At no point did I say that I thought sharing would stop completely. Similarly, the OP's original post didn't specifically exclude raid loot, which is why I have a problem with his suggestion.
An improvement which could be made to raid loot binding rules, which I don't think would disadvantage anyone, would be to make 20th list reward items BTCoE.
That might encourage people to run raids with characters who don't need anything for that raid. You pass what you get in the raid if you don't need it, but your 20th reward item is yours for any character you have.
Last edited by blerkington; 01-23-2013 at 10:23 PM.
Astrican on Khyber
... I'd settle for the ability to deconstruct event items to get the majority of ingredients back if I had to...
Goe ahed... korekt mah spelin'.
I have lessened my objections to this slightly I agree for nonraid gear that there should be a way but for raid gear no way and raid gear that isnt BTC now should be made that way. Componets are a different story though those shouldnt be bound.
The ANTI-Realms FANBOI NUKE THE REALMS ITS THE ONLY REAL WAY TO BE SURE
Thanks for that.
I've not pulled one on either my cleric or my wizard in many, many completions. If they were BTA I may not have been so happy to give them away, sad to say.
My ranger has stupidly good luck with them. He's pulled about five now, I think, including the one he got when soloing it on heroic normal. That was one of my better DDO moments.
Astrican on Khyber
This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.Reload